- [Standard half-size 80/40-10 mtr configuration]
- [6-40 mtr configuration by EARCHI]
- [Configuration by W3EDP]
©1999-2018 F. Dörenberg, unless stated otherwise. All rights reserved worldwide. No part of this publication may be used without permission from the author.
Last page update: 4 July 2018
As the name suggests, an "end-fed" antenna is just that: the radiating element is fed at one of its ends, instead of somewhere in-between its two ends (center-fed like a dipole, or off-center-fed). A special case of this, is the End-Fed Half-Wave (EFHW) antenna. Obviously, an EFHW antenna has a "half-wave" length only at one specific frequency: there is absolutely no such thing as a "multi-band end-fed half-wave" antenna.
A half-wavelength radiator has a high impedance (high voltage, low current) at the feedpoint. This high impedance is adapted to that of the feedline, e.g., a coax cable. There are two standard ways to match the end-fed radiator to the feedline:
- With an impedance transformer that has a variable capacitor across the antenna-side of the transformer. The resulting parallel-resonant circuit needs to be re-tuned when the operating frequency is changed. Here, the antenna is galvanically isolated from the feedline. This is also known as a "Fuchs" antenna, after OE1JF, Josef Fuchs (to be pronounced like "Foochs" in English) of Vienna/Austria, who patented it in 1927. In his original design, there are actually two variable capacitors: one across each side of the transformer. The parallel-resonant transformer circuit is called a Fuchs-circuit ("Fuchskreis" in German).
- With an impedance transformer that is configured as an auto-transformer. Hence, the antenna is not galvanically isolated from the feedline. Here too, one side of the transformer may have a fixed or variable capacitor across it.
Figure 1: The original "Fuchs" antenna
One way to make the Fuchs antenna multi-band, is to add selectable taps on the primary and/or the secondary side of the transformer. Further "tuning" can be done with a variable capacitor across the selected tap of the antenna-side winding of the transformer and the "bottom" of that winding. Ref. 1.
Figure 2: Multi-band "Fuchs" antenna with single tuning capacitor
Figure 3: Configuration with auto-transformer and a tuning trimmer-capacitor
In some implementations, the transformer can be switched between both configurations with a simple switch across the "bottom" of the transformer.
As stated, impedance transformation is done with a transformer. The voltage transformation ratio is equal to the transformer's turns ratio. The current transformation ratio is the reciprocal of that turns ratio. Hence, the impedance transformation ratio is the square of turns ratio:
Figure 4: Auto-transformer
Figure 5: Transformer ratios
It might seem that an "end-fed" is a monopole antenna: there is no explicit "counterpoise" in most end-fed designs. Obviously the end-fed radiator does need something to "push against", like all antenna radiators. If no "choke" balun is installed at the transformer, the radiator will simply use the coax as counterpoise - the coax will radiate! However, with a "choke" at the transformer, the radiator can only use coupling to objects in its environment to push against. This doesn't work very well. Which is why ref. 2A and 3 recommend installing a choke not directly at the transformer, but at 2-3 mtr (6-10 ft ≈ 0.05 λ) and 11 mtrs (≈36 ft) away from the transformer. Making the coax radiate will work, but is often undesirable. A simple and better solution is to use a piece of wire at the top of the feedline-side of the transformer. A short wire is all that is needed: about 0.05 λ ≈ 2.2 m or 7 ft for an 80m end-fed. See ref. 5.
The need for expanding the End-Fed with such a "counterpoise" wire was already recognized well over a century ago! Example: the famous "Zeppelin" ("Zepp") antenna system. it was patented by Hans Beggerow of Berlin/Germany in 1909 (ref. 9B). The patent states that the purpose of the invention is to move the antenna's high-voltage points away from an airship's balloon, to reduce the risk of igniting ever-present hydrogen leaks. The surface of the balloon and basket were often used as "counterpoise" for the antenna wire, or used to attach such a "counterpoise" to. So, Beggerow's application was for airships, such as the dirigibles designed and built by Ferdinand Count von Zeppelin. Hence the nickname "Zepp(elin)" antenna.
Figure 6: The original "Zeppelin" antenna
Beggerow's arrangement comprises a long antenna wire and a parallel-but-shorter "counterpoise" wire. The two parallel wires form a section of balanced transmission line. This is why the patent refers to it to as a "Lecher line", after the Austrian Ernst Lecher who used such an arrangement (with variable length) in the late 1880s to measure signal frequencies. The patent does not mention or suggest any dimensions for the wire lengths and their spacing, nor for the coupling transformer. It also does not suggest a tuning capacitor.
Figure 7: The Zepp antenna with tuning capacitor (Fuchs-circuit)
The transmission-line section of the original Zepp can be "sacrificed" by unfolding it, such that the antenna becomes an Off-Center Fed (OCF) doublet.
Figure 8: The Zepp antenna with tuning capacitor and unfolded transmission-line section
There are several commercial suppliers of end-fed antennas (e.g., ref. 1, 2A/B/C/D). But the design is simple enough for home-building at a (much) lower cost (though the QRP end-fed transformer of ref. 2D is quite reasonable).
NOTE: I have not completed measuring, tuning, and experimenting/playing with this type of antenna yet. So the discussion below is basically my current lab notes, and I cannot make any final conclusions yet. Also, at my location, I cannot install the antenna high enough (nor far away enough from the building), to get a low radiation angle for DX. To be continued...
NOTE: obviously, end-feds are not limited to HF frequencies. They can, e.g., be used to improve performance of VHF handheld transceivers, compared to using the "rubber ducky" antenna that is typically provided with such handhelds. Ref. 10.
COMMON 40-10 MTR OR HALF-SIZE 80-10 CONFIGURATION
I still need a reduced-size antenna for 80 mtrs that works acceptably well at my QTH. Scanning the "market" I came across advertizing, blogs, and forum threads about a half-size 80-10 multi-band end-fed (i.e., about 1/4 λ long on the lowest band). Based on its feedpoint location, an "end-fed" is easer to install at my QTH than a center-fed dipole (I can barely fit a 2x7 m dipole).
The basic antenna comprises:
- a wire that is about 1/4 wavelength on the lowest band,
- a loading coil,
- an extension wire beyond the coil,
- an impedance transformer, and
- a capacitor across the secondary side of the transformer.
Figure 9: Principle circuit diagram
Nominal dimensions and component values for 80-10 and 40-10 end-feds are given below. I used multi-strand AWG #14 THNN wire (1.6 mm Ø) from the DYI store for the antenna, and AWG #20 (0.8 mm Ø) enameled copper wire for the transformer and the coil.
Figure 10: Nominal dimensions of the multi-band end-fed antenna
The antenna generally has a high impedance (several thousand ohm) on most bands. So an impedance transformation ratio of about 1:50 to 1:60 is needed to get down to 50 Ω. I.e., a turns ratio of about 1:7 to 1:8.
Note that the feedpoint impedance depends on the ratio of length and diameter of the antenna wire! So, the transformer ratio that you actually need, depends on that wire-ratio, as well as on installation height, and the local environment.
Commercially-built multi-band end-feds (e.g., ref. 2A/B) use toroidal ferrite cores, such as the FT140-43 and FT240-43. These cores have an outside diameter of 1.40 and 2.40 inch respectively, and are made of material type nr. "43" (a nickel-zinc mix). However, the smaller one (FT140) has a slightly lower AL value ( inductance in μH per 1000 turns) than the larger one: 885 vs. 1075. Other companies use a toroidal iron-powder core (e.g., a T80-2 in ref. 1 (for QRP), and a T130-2 in ref. 2C).
Clearly, such transformers are not truly wide-band, covering 3.5 - 30 MHz (80-10 mtrs). If one prefers the lower bands (80/40), then a ferrite transformer with N = 3 on an FT240-43 core (larger AL value) would probably be best. Conversely, N = 2 on an FT140-43 core, would be more suitable when concentrating on the higher bands (40-10 mtr). With this smaller core, 50-60 watt continuous should be OK. The larger core should be OK for at least twice that.
- Wind the transformer with enameled copper wire ("CuL", "magnetic wire") with a diameter of 0.8 - 1 mm (AWG # 18 - 20).
- Note that when winding the transformer, each time you pass the wire through the core (i.e., including the first time!), counts as one turn. See the numbers in the photo below. The wire of the secondary winding is twisted onto the first turns of the primary winding, to get tighter coupling. The split-winding of the primary side (transition turn nr. 8 in the photo below) is supposed to reduce parasitic capacitance.
- Enameled wire is never perfectly coated with enamel, and the enamel does not provide high voltage insulation. Consider using teflon coated wire.
- Note that iron powder cores such as the T-200-2 have an AL that is 10-20% bigger than that of the above ferrite cores: 120 μH / 100 turns (be careful: AL of iron powder cores is specified as inductance per 100 turns, but for ferrite cores it is inductance per 1000 turns!). However, the permeability of the ferrite core is about 80x larger than that of the iron powder core! Stick with the ferrite cores for this application.
Figure 11: Impedance transformer with 16 primary turns and 2 secondary turns
(the 2-turn secondary winding is bifilar-twisted with the first 2 primary turns)
Figure 12: Components of the auto-transformer (ferrite core is an FT240-43)
Figure 13: The transformer fits nicely in a standard-size electrical junction box
A ceramic capacitor of 100-150 pF is placed across the secondary side of the transformer. Its purpose is to counteract the relatively high inductance of the transformer on the 15-10 mtr bands. The capacitor should have a rating of 500-1000 volt. A ceramic trimmer capacitor instead of a fixed capacitor makes adjusting for the highest band(s) easier.
The overall length of the 80-10 version of this antenna is about 23 mtrs (≈75 ft) - only about 1/4 λ on 80 mtrs. So a loading coil is added. The length of the wire beyond the coil has to be adjusted for the desired portion of the 80 mtr band (or of the 40 mtr band, if making the 40-10 antenna) and the local environment.
The nominal inductance of the loading coil is 110 μH for the 80-10 antenna, and 34 μH for the 40-10 version, see ref. 3A and 4. The 110 μH coil can be made with 260 turns of 1 mm Ø enameled copper wire (AWG #18) on a PVC core with a diameter of 19-20 mm (3/4 inch). Takes about 15.5 mtrs (50 ft) of that wire. Tightly wound, the core needs to be about 30-35 cm long, to allow for attaching strain-reliefs. As a sanity check and out of curiosity, I estimated the self-inductance of such a coil with on-line and other coil calculators (ref. 5A/B/C). The calculated inductance varied from 77 μH and 81 μH (with 0.112 mm (5 mils) turn-spacing and lump-sum equivalent calculation), 85 μH (zero turn-spacing, lumped-sum equivalent), 90 μH at 3.6 MHz, 119 μH at 7.5 MHz (effective series-resonance model). Actual inductance is indeed frequency dependent. The 34 μH requires only 90 turns.
Shrink tubing can be used for weatherizing (note that this changes the inductance slightly). For such a small diameter coil, the shrink tube opening on the highest side of the coil can be made watertight by stuffing it with hot-melt glue just before applying heat to the shrink tubing.
As I have a roll of AGW # 20 CuL (0.8 mm Ø), that's what I used. I wound my coil on a section of 50 mm Ø (2") PVC. Wire length is about 9.5 mtrs (31 ft). With 60 turns, coil height is 58.5 mm (2.3"). This suggests that my personal tight winding style results in a non-zero turn-spacing of 0.11 mm. I based the required number of turns on the same calculators mentioned above.
Figure 14: My 110 μH loading coil
Figure 15: Top view of the installation at my apartment, just above the roof
One can "cut off" a piece of wire, but not "cut on" a piece. As stated above, the length of the wires has to be adjusted. So it is best to start out with wires that are definitely too long, e.g., by 1 mtr (3 ft). Just fold back the excess and attach it onto itself. See photo below. Standard approach for tuning-and-pruning the antenna is to start with the band where the antenna acts as a 1/2-wave end-fed (40 mtrs for the 80-10 antenna, 20 mtrs for the 40-10 version), rather than for the lowest band. Ref. 4. Measure the SWR in the portion of the 40 mtr band that is of interest. Without an antenna analyzer, this is doable but definitely not easy.... If the frequency of the SWR dip is above that band portion, then reduce the long wire by 5 cm (2") and repeat the measurement. Conversely, slightly increase the length of the extension wire if the dip is below the band portion of choice. Repeat until the minimum SWR is achieved. Then follow the same procedure for adjusting the length of the extension wire for minimum SWR on the portion of the 80 mtr band that is of (most) interest. Finally, adjust the capacitor across the coax for minimum SWR in the10 mtr band.
Figure 16: End of the extension wire attached with a bungee cord, excess wire is folded back
The SWR plot below shows an SWR sweep with my miniVNA antenna analyzer, directly at the transformer. Note that I did not have a capacitor installed across the coax at the transformer! This probably explains the rising SWR at the higher frequencies. Or: my transformer is not nearly as broadband as it should be? I have seen some SWR plots and reports of this type of antenna from other builders/users - low SWR on all bands. Whatever the transformer, there should still be multiple resonance peaks as in my plot.
Figure 17: 2-30 MHz SWR sweep with 64:1 transformer and 60-turn loading coil
(no shunt capacitor across the coax)
At some point during my experiments (for some reason that I can no longer remember), I decided to reduce the number of turns of the coil from 60 to 53. The resulting SWR plot for the 80 mtr band is shown below:
Figure 18: 3-3.5 MHz SWR sweep with 64-1 transformer and 53-turn loading coil
6-40 MTR CONFIGURATION BY EARCHI
Ca. 2011, the Emergency Amateur Radio Club of Hawaii (EARCHI) marketed a matchbox-kit for a 6-40 mtr multi-band end-fed antenna. See ref. 8A, which includes the parts list and building instructions.
Configuration and operation(per ref. 8A):
- Recommended antenna wire length: 24-30 ft (60 ft max), e.g., 18 AWG. Length to be adjusted for best SWR and based on desire to operate on frequencies below the 40 m band. Longer wire will result in a radiation pattern with very many side-lobes in the higher frequency bands.
- Impedance transformer: UNUN (unbalanced-to-unbalanced) transformer with a 9:1 impedance transformation ratio
- The transformer has 3x9 turns. This results in a 27:9 = 3:1 voltage ratio. Hence, a 9:1 impedance ratio. For low SWR, the antenna impedance would have to be close to 9x50=450 ohm. Therefore, the antenna wire length (accounting for its velocity factor) should not be close to ½λ on any operating frequency, otherwise the antenna impedance will be several kohm. E.g., 2.7 kohm / 9 = 300 ohm or SWR=6.
- The transformer is trifilar ( = "3 wires") wound on an iron-powder toroid of type T130-2 (1.3 inch outside diameter, material type "2"), limiting transmitter power to 100 W at best.
- The manual says "...the transformer will match the high input impedance of the end fed antenna into the range where most antenna tuners can produce good performance...."
- No tuning or compensation capacitors.
- Recommended coax length: at least 16 feet; no current choke balun.
- Counterpoise: not required (hence, there is a recommended coax length), but the matchbox has a hookup lug.
Figure 19: 9:1 UNUN
I made the UNUN using wires with different colors, to make it easier to connecting them correctly. Note: sometimes the color of the enameled wire indicates which temperature is required for removing the enamel with a soldering iron. Check ref. 8A for parts list and building instructions.
Figure 20: My trifilarly wound transformer on a T130-2 core, ready for installation
Figure 21: My transformer, mounted in a small project box
(the black project-box measures 5x5x2 cm = 2x2x3/4 inch)
CONFIGURATION BY W3EDP
The original W3EDP from 1936 is a regular multiband end-fed for 160-80-40-20-10m (there were no WARC bands in those days). The antenna was matched directly to the transmitter ( = no feedline) with a parallel-resonant transformer circuit (a Fuchs-circuit, as described in the Introduction section). The antenna wire had a length of 84 ft (25.6 m), and was installed at a height of 20 ft (6 m). A 17 ft (5.2 m) long "counterpoise" wire (6.5 ft for 20m) was connected to the bottom of the antenna-side of the Fuchs circuit's transformer. This wire was installed indoors, along the ceiling of his shack (probably about 8 ft off ground level), so it could not be installed in parallel with the antenna wire. A tuning capacitor was placed across the antenna-side of the transformer, with unchanged setting on all bands. Ref. 9A.
Figure 22: The original W3EDP antenna configuration
In many later versions of the W3EDP, the "counterpoise" wire is installed in parallel with the antenna wire. The original and the later versions of the this antenna can be looked at in several ways (ref. 9C):
- When the antenna and "counterpoise" wires are arranged in parallel, as in the "Zepp", it has a 67 ft long antenna wire (84-17 = 67 ft). This antenna wire is fed via a section of parallel-wire transmission line with 1/4 the length of the antenna wire (i.e., 67/4 ≈ 17 ft).
- An 84 ft long end-fed antenna wire, with a "counterpoise" wire of 1/5 the length of that antenna wire (i.e., 84/5 ≈ 17 ft).
- An Off-Center-Fed (OCF) dipole with total span of 84+17=101 ft, with the feed point at 1/6th of the total span (101/6 ≈ 17 ft = 17%) from one end ( = 83/17 OCF). The dipole can be straight or bent.
Many modern versions of the W3EDP use the transmission line configuration, with a section of open-wire ladder line or standard 300 or 450 ohm ribbon twin-lead. Note that 300 and 450 ohm twin-lead have a slightly different velocity factor VF, so slightly different length must be used. Instead of the Fuchs-circuit transformer, a 4:1 BALUN or 4:1 UNUN is used. The twin-lead is typically installed vertically, and the antenna wire horizontally. Of course, it can be installed completely vertically (as in the original "Zepp" patent, or upside-down), in an inverted-V configuration, etc.
José Campione (VA3PCJ) has built and assed several versions of the modern W3EDP "Zepp". He used 300 ohm twin-lead and a 4:1 UNUN, with a 1:1 current choke between the UNUN and the coax to the tuner and transceiver:
- The full-size "flimsy" (ref. 9C) for the 10-80 m bands, or even 6-160 m: 17 ft (5.2 m) of twin-lead and 68 ft (20.7 m) of antenna wire (i.e., standard dimensions).
- The half-size "junior" (ref. 9D) for the 6-80 m bands: 8.5 ft (2.6 m) of twin-lead and 33.5 ft (10.2 m) of thin antenna wire. Vertically, this fits nicely on a standard 43 ft mast or pole.
- The quarter-size "mini" (ref. 9E) for the 10-20 m bands: 3.5 ft (1.1 m) of twin-lead and 16.75 ft (5.1 m) of thin antenna wire.
Figure 23: Versions of the W3EDP antenna by José Campione (VA3PCJ)
Frederic Benson (NC4FB) has done extensive experiments with four versions of the W3EDP (ref. 9F). He used 450 ohm twin-lead and a 4:1 voltage BALUN (though he recommends a current BALUN). For most configurations, a tuner with wide-range impedance matching capability is required.
- The full-size for the 6-80 m bands: 17 ft (5.2 m) of twin-lead and 67 ft (20.4 m) of antenna wire (i.e., standard dimensions). The antenna wire slopes upward from 20 to 25 ft above ground.
- Same, but with an additional "counterpoise" wire that is connected to the high-impedance side of the BALUN (on the side that is not connected to the antenna wire). The wire is 32 ft (9.8 m) long for the 80-40m bands. It has a switch half way, to reduce the length of the wire to 16 ft (4.9 m). The wire is simply laid on the ground, pointing away from the direction of the antenna wire.
- No transmission line. The antenna wire is in an L-configuration of 17+67=84 ft (25.6 m). There are two selectable "counterpoise" wires, connected to the BALUN. The wires are strung in parallel, spaced 2 inch (5 cm), and about 3 ft (1 m) off the ground. I.e., a zig-zag OCF dipole. The wire is 14 AWG THHN insulated stranded copper wire from the DIY store.
- Same, but instead of separate "counterpoise" wires, a steel tape-measure is used (33 ft x 1 inch = 10 m x 2.5 cm). The length of the tape is adjusted to optimize SWR for each band. Solely based on SWR, this has the best results. In order of decreasing length of the "counterpoise" wire: 40 m band (33 ft = 10 m), 20 m (19.5 ft = 6 m), 80 m & 6 m(13 ft = 4 m), 17 m (12 ft = 3.7 m), 15 m (9 ft = 2.8 m), 12 m (6.5 ft = 2 m), 10 m (5 ft = 1.5 m).
Figure 24: Versions 1 and 2 of the W3EDP antenna by Frederic Benson (NC4FB)
Figure 25: Versions 3 and 4 of the W3EDP antenna by Frederic Benson (NC4FB)
Nick Toparcean (AE5VV) uses the standard dimensions for 10-80 m, and an 85 ft long wire radiator for 10 -160 meters.
Some operators use a 4:1 BALUN, others a 4:1 UNUN, some in combination with a 1:1 current choke, some without. I have done some measurements with a 4:1 BALUN and a 4:1 UNUN.
Figure 26: 4:1 BALUN and UNUN wiring diagram
(note: the only difference is the inverted coax connection!)
Figure 27: The experimental 4:1 BALUN/UNUN of my W3EDP antenna
Figure 28: SWR sweep at my QTH of the W3EDP antenna with a 4:1 BALUN
(antenna analyzer directly at the BALUN; no 1:1 current choke between BALUN and coax)
Figure 29: SWR sweep at my QTH of the W3EDP antenna with a 4:1 UNUN
(antenna analyzer directly at the BALUN; no 1:1 current choke between BALUN and coax)
Figure 30: My W3EDP antenna is very portable
- Ref. 1: "Lambda/2 no Counterpoise: Fuchs Antenna matching unit", DL-QRP-AG, 6 pp. [pdf]
- Ref. 2: Commercially-built multi-band end-feds are available from manufacturers such as the ones listed below. Note that I do not endorse these products, as I have no experience with them (though I welcome any manufacturer who will provide me one for trials).
- Ref. 2A: HyEndFed
- Ref. 2B: PAR End-FedZ
- Ref. 2C: EARC END FED 6-40 Meter Multiband HF Antenna [incl. parts list and building instructions] [pdf]
- Ref. 2D: QRPGuys Portable Multi-Band End Fed Antenna 40/30/20 [schematic and build instructions], QRPGuys Portable No Tune End Fed Half Wave Antenna 80-10m [schematic and build instructions]
- Ref. 3: Some blogs and forum threads about this type of antenna:
- Ref. 3A: "Multi/Any band end-fed", Pleun Vermeulen (PA3HHO) blog (through 27 July 2015) [pdf]
- Ref. 3B: "End fed matching – PA3HHO design review ", Owen Duffy (VK1OD) blog [pdf]
- Ref. 3C: "Multiband PAR End-fedz nabouwen" zendamateur.com blog (in Dutch), through March 2011 [pdf]
- Ref. 3D: "Multiband end fed antennas 3.5 - 30 MHz", John Scheepers (PD7MAA), April 2012 [pdf]
- Ref. 3E: "End Fed Half Wave Antenna Coupler", MØUKD Amateur Radio Blog [pdf]
- Ref. 4: "Une antenne end-fed réellement multiband" ["A real multiband end-fed antenna"], Guy Marchal (ON5FM), QSP, Nr. 41, June 2014, pp. 18-23
- Ref. 5: "The End Fed Half Wave Antenna", Steve Yates (AA5TB), October 2014 [pdf]
- Ref. 6: Some on-line coil calculators:
- Ref. 6A: "Helical coil calculator" on pages of the Tesla Coill webring
- Ref. 6B: "K1QW Inductor Calculators"
- Ref. 6C: "ON4AA Single-layer Helical Round Wire Coil Inductor Calculator"
- Ref. 6D: "Turns-length calculator for ferrite and iron powder core toroids"
- Ref. 7: "Taming the end-fed antenna", Alan Chester (G3CCB, SK), in "Communications Quarterly", Spring 1998, pp. 17- 22 [pdf]
- Ref. 8: "A 3- or 5-band end-fed antenna"", Jos van den Helm (PA1ZP), RadCom (RSGB), Vol. 92, No. 2, Feb. 2016, pp. 54, 55, 58, 59. See note 1 at bottom of page.
- Ref. 9: EARCHI end-fed
- Ref. 8A: EARC END FED 6-40 Meter Multiband HF Antenna [incl. parts list and building instructions] [pdf]
- Ref. 8A: "Fine Tuning the EARCHI End Fed Antenna", pp. 59-61 of "Some Serious QRPp Work and Some Serious QRP Antennas", by Cam Hartford (N6GA), in "CQ Amateur Radio", January/February 2015 [pdf]
- Ref. 10: W3EDP end-fed
- Ref. 9A: "An Unorthodox Antenna", by Yardley Beers (W3AWH), in "QST", March 1936, pp. 32, 33 [pdf]
- Ref. 9C: "Luftleitergebilde für Luftschiffe", Dr. Hans Beggerow, Patenschrift Nr. 225204, Kaiserliches Patentamt (Empirial Patent Office), 19 September 1909. [pdf]
- Ref. 9C: "A “Flimsy” W3EDP Portable Antenna (“la Manquita”)", by José Campione (VA3PCJ), 22 May 2016 [pdf]
- Ref. 9D: "A 42′ Portable Endfed Multiband HF Antenna with no Wire on the Ground: the “W3EDP Jr.”", by José Campione (VA3PCJ), 15 August 2016 [pdf]
- Ref. 9E: "The MINI (1/4th) W3EDP – A Special Design for a Balcony Down South", by José Campione (VA3PCJ), 27 September 2016 [pdf]
- Ref. 9F: "W3EDP Multi-band Antenna" [pdf], and "Optimizing the W3EDP Antenna" [pdf]; in "NC4FB - Amateur Radio" weblog by Frederic Benson (NC4FB), September 2013
- Ref. 10: "Home-brew end-fed antennas for handhelds" [VHF], Pat Hawker (G3VA), "Technical Topics" column in RSGB "Radio Communication", Vol. 67, Nr. 1, January 1991, p. 29 [pdf]
Note 1: due to copyright reasons, this file is in a password-protected directory. Contact me if you need access for research or personal study purposes.
External links last checked: October 2015